The Global Federation of International Music Competitions is an independent international organization operating a structured system for the adjudication and evaluation of musical performance across instruments and disciplines. Its programs are governed by a unified framework emphasizing consistency, transparency, and defined evaluation standards.


Core Positioning Statement
The Global Federation of International Music Competitions operates as a structured, standards-based international adjudication system for the evaluation and presentation of musical performance. Its programs are governed by defined artistic criteria, credential-based adjudication, and selective progression based on demonstrated performance level. Within this framework, artistic work is assessed, documented, and presented through a formally administered process aligned with established practices in music performance evaluation.


Institutional Framework
Established in 2021, the Federation is a Canadian-registered organization operating within an international context of music performance evaluation. Its programs are structured to integrate adjudication, assessment, and professional presentation within a unified system governed by defined procedural and evaluative standards.

Adjudication and Professional Oversight
Evaluation is conducted by professional musicians, educators, and performing artists with established credentials in performance and pedagogy. Adjudicators are engaged through a credential-based selection process and represent a range of international professional backgrounds, including conservatory, academic, and performance-based institutions.
All adjudication is conducted independently and in accordance with standardized procedures designed to ensure consistency, impartiality, and clarity across all categories and levels of participation.

Evaluation Methodology
Assessment is conducted within a criterion-referenced framework in which performances are evaluated against defined artistic parameters. These include technical control, tonal production, rhythmic precision, stylistic accuracy, interpretative coherence, and overall musical execution.
Evaluation criteria are applied systematically across all submissions and are aligned with established approaches to performance assessment within conservatory and professional training environments.

Evaluation Criteria and Assessment Framework
Assessment is conducted within a criterion-referenced framework in which each performance is evaluated across defined artistic and technical parameters. The following criteria guide adjudication:
​

Advancement and Selection
Progression within multi-stage formats is determined through performance-based evaluation against defined standards. Advancement is granted only to submissions that demonstrate the level of artistic and technical attainment required for subsequent stages.
This process establishes a selective structure in which progression reflects demonstrated performance level within a standards-based adjudication system.

Philosophy of Artistic Evaluation
The Federation’s approach is grounded in the principle that artistic evaluation is defined by the attainment of established standards. Within this framework, recognition reflects the level of performance demonstrated as determined through structured and criterion-based adjudication.
This model operates within the broader landscape of music performance evaluation and contributes to the systematic documentation and assessment of artistic work across varying stages of development.

Proper Institutional Framing
Artistic evaluation is defined by the application of established performance standards rather than by predetermined numerical limitation. Within a criterion-based adjudication system, recognition reflects the level of performance demonstrated, independent of comparative ranking alone.
The Federation’s framework operates within the broader landscape of music performance evaluation, providing a structured context in which artistic work is assessed and documented according to defined criteria.

Recognition Framework 
Distinctions are assigned on the basis of defined performance criteria. Where equivalent levels of artistic achievement are demonstrated, corresponding distinctions are conferred accordingly.
This standards-based approach ensures that recognition reflects documented performance level within a consistent and formally adjudicated system.

Program Structure and International Access
The Federation operates within an international framework that enables participation across geographic regions while maintaining structured evaluation and professional oversight.
Its programs provide a coordinated environment in which artistic work is evaluated within a consistent adjudication system accessible across international contexts.

International Context of Evaluation
Participation within an international adjudication framework situates artistic performance within a broader comparative context. By extending evaluation beyond localized environments, performances are assessed against a wider spectrum of standards, providing a comprehensive reference for artistic level and development.

Program Infrastructure and Resource Allocation
The Federation maintains an integrated operational structure supporting adjudication, administration, and participant services. This includes adjudicator engagement, program coordination, digital platform management, and the production and international distribution of official documentation and awards, including medals, trophies, and certification.
The program framework further encompasses scholarship-based recognitions, curated digital presentation of selected participants, and the production of professional media materials, including recorded interviews, editorial features, and audio-visual documentation.
Performance initiatives are coordinated for distinguished participants, including venue arrangements, rehearsal coordination, and program administration for appearances in established international concert settings, including Carnegie Hall.
Assessment outcomes are determined exclusively through defined evaluation criteria applied consistently across all submissions. The evaluation process operates independently of participation volume and is structured to ensure that recognition reflects demonstrated artistic standards.

Documentation and Public Presentation
Participants receive formal documentation of results issued within a standardized framework. Selected performances and artist profiles are presented through publicly accessible platforms, providing verifiable documentation of artistic activity within an international context.

Position within the International Performance and Evaluation Landscape
The Federation operates within the broader international ecosystem of music performance and evaluation, contributing a structured and professionally administered adjudication system aligned with contemporary modes of participation.
Its programs are defined by the consistent application of established artistic standards within a formal adjudication framework. Evaluation outcomes reflect demonstrated performance level rather than predetermined numerical limitation.
Within this context, the Federation provides a formally governed platform in which artistic work is evaluated, documented, and presented. Its role complements existing competition and institutional models by offering a structured environment for performance assessment and recognition within an international setting.

Access and Development within the Musical Ecosystem
The international landscape of music performance encompasses a range of evaluation models, each serving distinct functions within artistic development. The Federation’s programs operate within this ecosystem by providing structured evaluation and documentation of performance within a standards-based adjudication system.

Engagement with International Music Education
The Federation maintains engagement with the broader field of music education through contributions to international academic and professional forums. Members of its governing body have presented work in association with the International Society for Music Education, addressing topics related to adjudication methodology, performance assessment, and pedagogical approaches.
These activities reflect ongoing alignment with established and evolving practices in music education and artistic evaluation.

Commitment to Professional Standards
​The Federation maintains continuous refinement of its adjudication processes, evaluation criteria, and operational systems to ensure consistency, clarity, and alignment with professional expectations in music performance and education.
Through structured procedures, credential-based adjudication, and defined assessment methodologies, the Federation provides a formally governed environment in which artistic performance is evaluated and recognized within an international context.

​

---

Official Board of Jury Members 

​​​Maestro Adam Johnson - Conductor (USA)
Prof. Alan Fraser (Serbia & Canada)
Maestra Alessia Vitali - Mezzo-Soprano  (Canada)
Prof. Aline Kutan (Canada)
Prof. Amelie Fradette (USA)
Prof. Andrea Cardinale (Italy)
Dr. Angela Chan (Canada) - Senior RCM Examiner (Retired)
Dr. Anna Szpilberg (Professor, Concordia University)
Prof. Ankhbayar Bayarsaikhan (Mongolia)
Prof.  Avguste Antonov (USA)
Dr. Derek Yaple-Schobert (Canada)
Dr. Gabriel Prynn (Co-director, Fibonacci Trio)
Prof. Hitoshi Kawashima (Japan)
Prof. Izaskun Erdocia Uranga (Spain / currently located in Hong Kong)
Prof. Janette Wolff  (Canada)
Prof. Jorge Chaminé (International Yehudi Menuhin Foundation,  Président fondateur du CEM- Centre Européen de Musique)
Dr.  Julie-Anne Derome (Canada)
Prof. Laurence Kayaleh (Canada)
Maestro Massimiliano Valenti (Italy)
Prof. Martin Kwok Tin Choy (Hong Kong)
Dr. MingMei Yip (USA) 
Prof. Nancy Loo (Hong Kong) 
​Prof. Philippe Chao (USA)
Prof. Stephen Wong (Prof. of HKAPA, Chinese University (Hong Kong), Baptist University HK)
Prof. Steve Cowan (Canada)
Prof. Sebastian Di Bin (Italy)
Dr.  Sungho Park (South Korea)
Prof. Suzanne Benoit (France)
Prof. Takahiro Hoshino (Japan)
Prof. Teresa Tang (McGill University, University of Toronto)
Dr. Tien Feng (China)
Dr. Thomas Green (Chief Examiner of Royal Conservatory of Music) 
Prof. Tom Plaunt (Canada) - Retired Chair of Music department at McGill University
Prof. Victor Khotulev (Russia)
Prof. Warren Cohen (USA)
Prof. Wei He (China)
​Prof. Yan Ren (China)
Dr.  Yeh Wei Ding (China)
Dr. Yoonie Han (South Korea, Hong Kong)
Prof. Yulia Nesterenko (Canada)
​